Evidence Hub

A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Hounsfield Units on Computed Topography Relative to Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in the Spine Surgery Population

D. Ahern, J. McDonnell, M. Riffault, Shane R Evans, Scott C. Wagner, A. Vaccaro, D. Hoey, J. Butler

The spine journal, 2021

77 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The preoperative identification of osteoporosis in the spine surgery population is of crucial importance. Limitations associated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry(DXA), such as access and reliability, have prompted the search for alternative methods to diagnose osteoporosis. The Hounsfield Unit(HU), a readily available measure on computed tomography(CT), has garnered considerable attention in recent years as a potential diagnostic tool for reduced bone mineral density(BMD). However, the optimal threshold settings for diagnosing osteoporosis have yet to be determined.

METHODS

We selected studies that included comparison of the HU(index test) with DXA evaluation(reference test). Data quality was assessed using the standardised QUADAS-2 criteria. Studies were characterised into 3 categories, based on the threshold of the index test used with the goal of obtaining a high sensitivity, high specificity or balanced sensitivity-specificity test.

RESULTS

9 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. In the high specificity group, the pooled sensitivity was 0.652 (95% CI 0.526 - 0.760), specificity 0.795 (95% CI 0.711 - 0.859) and diagnostic odds ratio was 6.652 (95% CI 4.367 - 10.133). In the high sensitivity group, the overall pooled sensitivity was 0.912 (95% CI 0.718 - 0.977), specificity was 0.67 (0.57 - 0.75) and diagnostic odds ratio was 19.424 (5.446 - 69.275). In the balanced sensitivity-specificity group, the overall pooled sensitivity was 0.625 (95% CI 0.504 -…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free