Intermittent Versus Continuous Energy Restriction for Weight Loss and Metabolic Improvement: A Meta‐Analysis and Systematic Review

Sha-Sha He, Jiao Wang, Jie Zhang, Ji-Xiong Xu

Obesity, 2020

50 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent energy restriction (IER; only for 2‐3 d/wk) versus continuous energy restriction (CER) on weight loss and metabolic outcomes in adults with overweight or obesity.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

• DOI
• PubMed
• Publisher page

Related studies

• Chaos and quantum thermalization Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 1994
• The Dalton quantum chemistry program system Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Computational Molecular Science, 2013
• Cord Blood Leptin and Adiponectin as Predictors of Adiposity in Children at 3 Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study Pediatrics, 2009
• Quantitative metabolomics by H-NMR and LC-MS/MS confirms altered metabolic pathways in diabetes PloS one, 2010
• Stable adiabatic quantum batteries Physical Review E, 2019
• A novel self-lipid antigen targets human T cells against CD1c(+) leukemias The Journal of experimental medicine, 2014

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free