Evidence Hub

Magnetic-Assisted Manipulation of Rare Blood Cells for Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

Iyer PR, Wu X, Choe H, Tran LNT, González KMP, Rezaei B, Mostufa S, Azizi E et al.

Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

The precise isolation and analysis of rare cells from blood are crucial for biomedical research and clinical diagnostics. This review examines recent advancements in magnetic-based separation techniques, focusing on their efficiency in capturing rare cells such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating fetal cells, and diseased red blood cells (RBCs). These methods use magnetophoresis under external magnetic fields for highly specific isolation with minimal contamination, offering advantages over traditional techniques in speed, cost-effectiveness, and robustness. Magnetic separation is categorized into label-based methods, which use immunomagnetic nanoparticles (IMNs) to target specific cell markers, and label-free methods, which exploit differences in magnetic susceptibility. Both approaches have achieved up to 99% efficiency in isolating diseased RBCs and CTCs. However, challenges remain in improving purity, scalability, and clinical applicability. A key limitation of label-based methods is the need to detach cells from magnetic beads without compromising viability. Label-free technologies, such as magnetic levitation, enable ligand-free separation based on density and susceptibility. Future research should focus on optimizing paramagnetic media, integrating machine learning for enhanced accuracy, and developing high-gradient magnetic fields (~1000 T/m) to improve efficiency. Advancements in IMNs with stronger magnetic properties will further enhance separation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free