Evidence Hub

Influence of Disease-Modifying Therapy on the Efficacy of Vutrisiran in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis

Abovich A, Fontana M, Claggett B, Gillmore JD, Cappelli F, Ambardekar AV, Morbach C, Garcia-Pavia P et al.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2026

654 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vutrisiran, an RNA interference therapeutic, reduced all-cause mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) in the HELIOS-B trial. Whether concomitant disease-modifying or heart failure therapy modifies the efficacy of vutrisiran has not been described.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to characterize patterns of concomitant therapy use in HELIOS-B, describe medication initiation rates by treatment arm, and evaluate whether concomitant therapy modified vutrisiran's treatment effect.

METHODS: In HELIOS-B, 654 randomized patients with ATTR-CM received vutrisiran or placebo. We assessed baseline use and postrandomization initiation of tafamidis, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), beta-blockers, and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors), and used time-updated Lin-Wei-Yang-Ying models to evaluate treatment effect modification on the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events.

RESULTS: At baseline, 40% of participants were receiving tafamidis and 77% at least 1 heart failure medication. MRAs and SGLT2 inhibitors were the most frequently initiated therapies during follow-up, with initiation rates numerically higher across all heart failure medication classes in the placebo group. There was no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 654 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free