Evidence Hub

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 and the Effect of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure: Insights From the DAPA-HF Trial

Berg DD, Docherty KF, Talebi A, Sattar N, Jarolim P, Welsh P, Jhund PS, Anand IS et al.

Journal of cardiac failure, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, a stress-induced cytokine implicated in systemic energy homeostasis, is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF). This study evaluated the associations between baseline GDF-15 and the clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction in the DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-outcomes in Heart Failure) trial. The effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on circulating GDF-15 levels and the effect of dapagliflozin on clinical outcomes in relation to baseline GDF-15 concentrations were also examined.

METHODS AND RESULTS: DAPA-HF was a randomized trial of dapagliflozin in patients with HF and LVEF ≤ 40%. GDF-15 was measured at baseline and 12 months. The primary outcome was the composite of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. The median baseline GDF-15 level was 1888 (IQR: 1323-2755) pg/mL. Higher GDF-15 levels were associated with older age, lower body mass index, and greater HF symptom burden. There was a stepwise increase in adjusted risk for the primary outcome across quartiles of baseline GDF-15 (adjusted hazard ratio [Q4 vs Q1] 2.30, 95% CI 1.66-18; P trend < 0.001). Dapagliflozin did not significantly change GDF-15 concentrations over 12 months, compared to placebo (placebo-corrected relative change +4%; 95% CI, -2% to +10%). The relative effect of dapagliflozin on the primary outcome was consistent across GDF-15 quartiles (P…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free