Evidence Hub

Safety of Intravenous Methamphetamine in Patients Taking Mirtazapine: A Two-Site Phase 1b Randomized Controlled Trial

Black F, Santos GM, McMahan VM, Fraser A, Clark J, Sturgeon L, Walker J, Kochanska M et al.

Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2026

15 participants

Abstract

Background: There are no approved medications to treat methamphetamine use disorder. We conducted a phase 1b, inpatient,randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject crossover study to evaluate the safety of mirtazapine, a potential treatment for methamphetamine use disorder with positive phase 2 trial findings, in people receiving intravenous methamphetamine.

Methods: Participants received mirtazapine 30 mg or placebo daily for 5 days, underwent an intravenous methamphetamine 30 mg challenge on day 5, followed by 2 days of washout, and then switched to the other study arm and received a second methamphetamine infusion at day 12. We monitored participants for adverse events, cardiovascular effects, and pharmacokinetics.

Results: Participants (N = 15; 12 with no opioid use and 3 on methadone maintenance treatment) reached steady state mirtazapine levels before methamphetamine infusions. During the mirtazapine phase, participants reached methamphetamine peak plasma concentration 0.26 hours earlier than the placebo phase ( P = 0.02); no other impacts on methamphetamine pharmacokinetics were observed. Mirtazapine neither attenuated nor enhanced the expected cardiovascular effects of methamphetamine, including in participants receiving methadone maintenance therapy. Adverse events were similar between mirtazapine 30 mg and placebo.

Conclusions: Mirtazapine 30 mg was safe and well-tolerated in people receiving a clinically relevant intravenous methamphetamine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free