A 26-week, Randomised, Open-labelled, Two-arm, Parallel-group, Treat-to-target Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Soluble Insulin Analogue Combination (SIAC) Twice Daily (BID) With Biphasic Insulin Aspart (BIAsp) 30 BID, With or Without Metformin, With or Without DPP-4 Inhibitor, With or Without Pioglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes in Inadequate Glycaemic Control on Once or Twice Daily Premixed or Self-mixed Insulin Regimen With or Without OADs (BOOST™: Intensify Premix 1)
Abstract
This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and Oceania. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare NN5401 (insulin degludec/insulin aspart) with biphasic insulin aspart 30 in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Conditions: Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Primary outcome: Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c).
Enrollment: 447 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 447 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Metformin as an adjuvant in breast cancer treatment
- Metformin Lysosomal Targeting: A Novel Aspect to Be Investigated for Metformin Repurposing in Neurodegenerative Diseases?
- Aberrant HSF1 signaling activation underlies metformin amelioration of myocardial infarction in mice
- Metformin induces ZFP36 by mTORC1 inhibition in cervical cancer-derived cell lines
- Protein Interaction Network for Identifying Vascular Response of Metformin (Oral Antidiabetic)
- Preventing Long COVID With Metformin
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.