Evidence Hub

A preliminary randomized trial of a brief dissonance-based type 2 diabetes prevention programme for adults with pre-diabetes

Stice E, Rohde P, Desjardins CD, Gee K, Shaw H, Kim S

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025

62 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: Conduct a preliminary randomized trial that compared a 6-week type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevention programme to an educational video control for adults with pre-diabetes.

Methods: Adults (N = 62) with pre-diabetes were randomized to the group-delivered Project Health T2D or an educational video control, completing measures at pre-test, post-test and 3-month follow-up.

Results: Participants randomized to the intervention versus control condition showed significantly greater reductions in body fat (d = 0.76, p = 0.002; d = 1.07, p 2; d = 0.60, p = 0.030; 0.67, p = 0.014), significantly greater increases in lean mass (d = 0.80, p = 0.003; 0.93, p = 0.001) at post-test and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and marginally greater reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (d = 0.54, p = 0.056), but not fasting plasma glucose at 3-month follow-up (d = 0.25, p = 0.364). Project Health T2D also produced a marginally greater 75% reduction in future onset of type 2 diabetes compared with educational controls, reducing incidence over the total 5-month observation period from 15% to 4% (odds ratio = 4.52, p = 0.096).

Conclusions: Project Health T2D produced encouraging reductions in body fat, weight and T2D incidence, and increases in lean mass, and is less intensive than other lifestyle modification T2D prevention programme, suggesting that it might be useful to evaluate in a fully powered efficacy trial with a longer follow-up.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 62 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free