Evidence Hub

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of severe Legionella pneumophila pneumonia diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in children: a case series of 8 patients

Song Y, Wang H, Lin L, Cheng Y, Shen Y

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026

8 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Severe Legionella pneumophila (LP) pneumonia is exceedingly rare in children, and clinical data remain scarce.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 8 children with severe LP pneumonia diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) at Henan Children's Hospital between January 2020 and January 2026.

Results: The cohort comprised 3 males and 5 females with a median age of 74 days (range, 8 days to 9 years); neonates accounted for 50.0% (4/8), and 75.0% (6/8) had no underlying diseases. Six cases were community-acquired and 2 were hospital-acquired. The predominant manifestations were tachypnea/dyspnea (100.0%) and fever (87.5%); neonates presented with lethargy and poor feeding. Complications included respiratory failure (87.5%), multiple organ dysfunction (62.5%), and septic shock (37.5%). Procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and LDH were elevated in all cases, while ALB was uniformly decreased. Bilateral pulmonary involvement was seen in 87.5% on chest imaging. mNGS detected LP in all 8 cases (100%), whereas conventional sputum and blood cultures failed to identify LP in any case; LP was isolated from a surgical pus specimen in only 1 case. Co-infections were identified in 50.0%. All initial empirical regimens failed to cover LP. After mNGS-guided targeted therapy, the fluoroquinolone-rifampin combination (2 cases) achieved complete recovery, while macrolide-based regimens yielded variable outcomes. Overall, 50.0% were cured or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 8 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free