Evidence Hub

First-in-human phase I study of hypoxia-targeting 64Cu-ATSM radioligand therapy in patients with malignant brain tumors (STAR-64)

Kurihara H, Narita Y, Ito K, Sato H, Miyakita Y, Takahashi M, Ohno M, Yanagisawa S et al.

ESMO open, 2026

18 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypoxic microenvironments throughout tumors contribute to proliferation and resistance to chemoradiotherapy. Copper-64 diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (64Cu-ATSM) is a first-in-class drug enabling hypoxia-targeting radioligand therapy with β- particles and high-linear energy transfer Auger electrons, originally employed for positron emission tomography imaging. We report the first-in-human study of 64Cu-ATSM therapy in patients with recurrent brain tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I dose-escalation trial (STAR-64, jRCT2091220362) evaluated intravenous 64Cu-ATSM administered four times at 30, 60, 99, or 150 MBq/kg weekly in patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors, using the 3 + 3 design. Primary objectives were to assess dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and organ dosimetry.

RESULTS: Eighteen patients received 64Cu-ATSM: grade 3 glioma (anaplastic astrocytoma and anaplastic oligodendroglioma) 27.8%, grade 4 glioma (glioblastoma) 50%, malignant meningioma 11.1%, and metastatic brain tumors 11.1%. DLTs, consisting only of grade 3 lymphopenia, were observed in four patients: one at 60 MBq/kg, one at 99 MBq/kg, and two at 150 MBq/kg. The MTD was established as 99 MBq/kg. Two patients had a radiographic complete response by RECIST v1.1 with long-term survival: ≥45 months for a patient with anaplastic oligodendroglioma (60 MBq/kg) and ≥23…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free