Evidence Hub

Heat Adaptation Benefits for Vulnerable groups In Africa (HABVIA): a study protocol for a controlled clinical heat adaptation trial

Deglon M, Africa C, Soepnel LM, Kapwata T, Aikins AD, Bedu-Addo K, Howard G, Lambert EV et al.

BMC public health, 2025

240 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Temperatures across Africa are expected to rise at up to twice the rate of mean global temperatures, posing significant health threats to vulnerable communities. Prolonged exposure to high day- and night-time temperatures has been implicated in a myriad of adverse health outcomes. The built environment and inadequate housing can exacerbate these consequences, prompting the need to evaluate heat adaptation interventions as a sustainable adaptation strategy for low-income and informal settlement dwellers. The Heat Adaptation Benefits for Vulnerable groups In Africa (HABVIA) study aims to assess the impact of passive cooling interventions in homes on several key physiologic and mental health outcomes, as well as building internal thermal conditions.

Methods: HABVIA is a 3-year prospective controlled study to identify, implement and assess heat adaptation solutions in four low-income communities in one urban and one rural site in Ghana and South Africa, respectively. In each site, N=240 participants (N=60 per site) will be assigned to intervention or control groups. The intervention is focused on lowering the nighttime temperature of the home environment. Health and biometric data will be collected through a combination of physiological measurements, questionnaires, and biochemical measures taken at 3 time points during the hot season. Clinical outcomes include objective sleep behaviour, core body temperature, physical activity, blood pressure, blood glucose,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free