Evidence Hub

No relevant relationship between glucose variability and oxidative stress in well-regulated type 2 diabetes patients

Siegelaar SE, Barwari T, Kulik W, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH

Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011

39 citations

Abstract

Background: A strong relationship between glycemic variability and oxidative stress in poorly regulated type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on oral medication has been reported. However, this relationship was not seen in type 1 diabetes. The purpose of this study is to reexamine the relation between glycemic variability and oxidative stress in a cohort of T2DM patients on oral medication.

Methods: Twenty-four patients with T2DM on oral glucose lowering treatment underwent 48 hours of continuous glucose monitoring (CGMS® System GoldTM, Medtronic MiniMed) and simultaneous collection of two consecutive 24-hour urine samples for determination of 15(S)-8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Standard deviation (SD) and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were calculated as markers of glycemic variability.

Results: Included in the study were 66.7% males with a mean age (range) of 59 (36-76) years and a mean (SD) HbA1c of 6.9% (0.7). Median [interquartile range (IQR)] urinary 15(S)-8-iso-PGF2α excretion was 176.1 (113.6-235.8) pg/mg creatinine. Median (IQR) SD was 31 (23-40) mg/dl and MAGE 85 (56-106) mg/dl. Spearman correlation did not show a significant relation for SD (ρ = 0.15, p = .49) or MAGE (ρ = 0.23, p = .29) with 15(S)-8-iso-PGF2α excretion. Multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, HbA1c, and exercise did not alter this observation.

Conclusions: We did not find a relevant relationship between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free