Evidence Hub

In vivo alterations in drug metabolism and transport pathways in patients with chronic kidney diseases

Joy MS, Frye RF, Nolin TD, Roberts BV, La MK, Wang J, Brouwer KL, Dooley MA et al.

Pharmacotherapy, 2014

21 citations

Abstract

Study objective: This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the in vivo activities of drug transporters, metabolizing enzymes, and pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) caused by glomerulonephritis and nonglomerular etiologies.

Design: A prospective study design.

Participants: Eighteen adults with CKD.

Setting: General Clinical Research Center at the University of North Carolina and University of Pittsburgh.

Measurement and main results: Blood and urine were collected and assayed for fexofenadine (transporter function) as well as flurbiprofen and 4-hydroxyflurbiprofen (CYP2C9 function). CYP3A4 activity was assessed by the erythromycin breath test. In patients with glomerulonephritis, the apparent oral clearance of fexofenadine (representing transporter activity) was 58.8 ± 34.4 L/hour, documenting a 40% reduction compared with previous data in healthy controls. The CYP2C9 pathway (4-hydroxyflurbiprofen formation clearance) was similar in all the patients with CKD and was concordant with previous reports of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and healthy controls. For flurbiprofen, patients with glomerulonephritis had higher oral clearance than those with nonglomerular CKD, suggesting higher unbound fraction and enhanced metabolism through other (non-CYP2C9) routes. No statistically significant differences in CYP3A4 activity were observed in either group of patients or when compared with results from previous studies of patients with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free