Evidence Hub

Effect of Paleolithic-based low-carbohydrate vs. moderate-carbohydrate diets with portion-control and calorie-counting on CTRP6, asprosin and metabolic markers in adults with metabolic syndrome: A randomized clinical trial

F. Shemirani, Kurosh Djafarian, A. Fotouhi, L. Azadbakht, N. Rezaei, M. Chamari, S. Shabani, M. Mahmoudi

Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2021

69 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several recent studies have been undertaken into carbohydrate-restricted diets. it has not been clearly demonstrated whether diets with different proportions of energy from carbohydrate exert distinct effects on metabolism and inflammation or not. The current randomized clinical trial (RCT) has been conducted to further elucidate the effects of severe and mild carbohydrate restriction on inflammation and cardiometabolic status in adults with metabolic syndrome (MetS).

METHODS

Eighty adults with metabolic syndrome were randomized to one of the four carbohydrate restricted diets: Paleolithic-based low-carbohydrate diet with calorie-counting method (PLCD-CC) (n = 20), Paleolithic-based low-carbohydrate diet with portion-control method (PLCD-PC) (n = 20), moderate-carbohydrate diet with calorie-counting method (MCD-CC) (n = 20) and moderate-carbohydrate diet with portion-control method (MCD-PC) (n = 20) for 10 weeks. PLCD is defined as a diet consisting of 25-30% of energy from carbohydrate, 30% of energy from protein and 40-45% of energy from fat and encourages consumption of fruits, vegetables and lean meat. MCD is characterized as 40-45% carbohydrate, 30% protein and 30-35% fat. Body weight and composition, adipokines such as Asprosin, chemerin, leptin, hepatokines namely CTRP-6, FGF-21 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors were tested at baseline and at the end of 10 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 69 participants aged 42.95 (9.27) with metabolic syndrome…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 69 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free