Evidence Hub

Memory Advancement by Intranasal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes (MemAID) Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial: Design, Methods and Rationale

B. Galindo-Mendez, J. A. Trevino, Regina E. McGlinchey, C. Fortier, V. Lioutas, Peter Novák, C. Mantzoros, L. Ngo et al.

Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2020

210 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accelerates brain aging and increases the risk for dementia. Insulin is a key neurotrophic factor in the brain, where it modulates energy metabolism, neurovascular coupling, and regeneration. Impaired insulin-mediated brain signaling and central insulin resistance may contribute to cognitive and functional decline in T2DM. Intranasal insulin (INI) has emerged as a potential therapy for treating T2DM-related cognitive impairment. Methods/Design Ongoing from 2015, a prospective, two-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 210 subjects (120 T2DM and 90 non-diabetic older adults) randomized into four treatment arms (60 T2DM-INI, 60 T2DM-Placebo, 45 Control-INI, and 45 Control-Placebo) evaluating the long-term effects of daily intranasal administration of 40 International Units (IU) of human insulin, as compared to placebo (sterile saline) over 24 weeks and 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up. Study outcomes are: 1) long-term INI effects on cognition, daily functionality, and gait speed; 2) identifying a clinically relevant phenotype that predicts response to INI therapy; 3) long-term safety. Conclusion This study addresses an important knowledge gap about the long-term effects of intranasal insulin on memory and cognition in older people with T2DM and non-diabetic controls, and may provide a novel therapeutic target for prevention and treatment of cognitive and functional decline and dementia. Trial Registration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 210 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free