Evidence Hub

Impact of sustainable diets on micronutrient intakes and status: outcomes of the MyPlanetDiet randomized controlled trial

U. Leonard, K. P. Davies, L. Lindberg, J. Woodside, Anne P. Nugent, A. O'Sullivan, E. Gibney, S. McCarthy et al.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2025

355 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data from dietary intervention studies to test the ability of sustainable diets to meet micronutrient (MN) requirements is required.

OBJECTIVE

To compare MN intakes and status among adults who received dietary counselling to follow a sustainable diet or a standard healthy diet.

METHODS

We conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial among 355 healthy adults aged 18-64 years in three centers over 12-weeks. Participants received personalized dietary counselling; the intervention arm for a sustainable healthy diet and the control arm for a healthy diet. Greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), MNs and biomarkers of nutritional status were assessed, and the prevalence of inadequate intakes was defined by the proportion of participants with usual intakes below harmonized Average Requirements. Data were analyzed using two-way mixed ANCOVA (time and treatment) on complete-cases.

RESULTS

There were differential changes in intakes in the intervention arm compared to controls for GHGE (-22%), energy (-8%), retinol (-25%), thiamin (-11%), riboflavin (-16%), niacin (-16%), calcium (-16%), zinc (-13%), potassium (-10%), selenium (-15%), and iodine (-26%), vitamins B6 (-12%), B12 (-36%), C (-23%), D (-28%) and K1 (30%) (Pinteraction < 0.05). These were consistent following energy adjustment for retinol, riboflavin, niacin, calcium, iodine and vitamins B12 and K1. The prevalence of inadequate intakes of riboflavin, vitamins B6 and B12, calcium and zinc increased considerably,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 355 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free