Evidence Hub

Pelvic insufficiency fractures following carbon-ion radiotherapy for uterine carcinomas

Miyasaka Y, Okonogi N, Fukahori M, Furuichi W, Wakatsuki M, Kato S, Ohno T, Nakano T et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2021

102 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is growing evidence on the role of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for gynaecological tumours. Pelvic insufficiency fracture (PIF) decreases the quality of life after photon beam radiotherapy (RT). However, there is little information on PIF after C-ion RT. This study retrospectively assessed incidence of PIF after C-ion RT for uterine carcinomas (UCs) and the associations of clinical and dosimetric parameters with PIF incidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of 102 patients with UCs who underwent definitive C-ion RT alone and were followed up for >6 months without any additional RT in the pelvic region. PIF occurrence was surveyed using magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography. Associations of clinical and dosimetric parameters with PIF incidence were analysed.

RESULTS: The 2- and 5-year actuarial incidences of ≥grade 1 PIF in all pelvic regions were 22.3% and 42.4%, respectively. The most frequent site of involvement was the sacrum. Log-rank tests showed that higher volumes receiving >10 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) (V10), V20, V30, and V40, body mass index (BMI) under 18.5, and current smoking were associated with increased incidence of ≥grade 1 PIF in the sacrum.

CONCLUSIONS: We clarified the actuarial incidence of PIF after C-ion RT for UCs. Higher V10, V20, V30, V40, D50%, Dmean, current smoking, BMI <18.5, and using the anterior-posterior direction in whole pelvic irradiation were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 102 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free