Evidence Hub

ProQSAR: A modular and reproducible framework for small-data QSAR modeling with fit-and-use models

Phan TM, Phan TL, Van-Nguyen PC, Le LHS, To VT, Truong TN, Merkle D, Stadler PF

Journal of cheminformatics, 2026

Abstract

Background: Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are central to computer-aided drug discovery and predictive toxicology, but practical adoption is often impeded by ad-hoc tooling, inconsistent validation protocols, and poor reproducibility.

Objective: We introduce ProQSAR, a modular, reproducible workbench that formalizes end-to-end QSAR development while permitting independent use of each component.

Methods: ProQSAR composes interchangeable modules for standardization, feature generation, splitting (including scaffold- and cluster-aware splits), preprocessing, outlier handling, scaling, feature selection, model training and tuning, statistical comparison, conformal calibration, and applicability-domain assessment. The pipeline can run end-to-end to produce versioned artifact bundles (serialized models) and analyst-oriented reports suitable for deployment and audit.

Results: On representative MoleculeNet benchmarks evaluated under Bemis-Murcko scaffold split, ProQSAR attains state-of-the-art descriptor-based performance: the lowest mean RMSE across the regression suite (ESOL, FreeSolv, Lipophilicity; mean RMSE 0.658±0.11 ), including a substantial improvement on FreeSolv (RMSE 0.494 vs. 0.731 for a leading graph method). On quantum mechanical benchmarks, ProQSAR demonstrated superior performance on the single-task dataset QM7 and maintained competitive results on the multi-task QM8 dataset. For classification, ProQSAR achieves the top ROC-AUC on ClinTox…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free