Evidence Hub

Optimizing Reconstruction Parameters for Detecting Peripheral In-Stent Restenosis with Photon-Counting Detector CT: A Phantom Study

Tan Y, Hop JF, Dobrolinska M, Zheng X, Hoeijmakers EJI, de Vries JPM, Greuter MJW, Bokkers RPH

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To determine the optimal reconstruction parameters for accurate visualization of peripheral in-stent restenosis using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT), and to evaluate its potential advantages over energy-integrated detector CT (EID-CT). Methods: Endovascular peripheral stents with varying degrees of in-stent restenosis were scanned in a custom-made phantom using EID-CT (Somatom Force) and PCD-CT (Naeotom Alpha) under clinical acquisition protocols. EID-CT images were reconstructed with Bv40 and Bv59 kernels at 512 matrices. PCD-CT data were acquired in standard-resolution (SR) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) modes. In both modes, images were reconstructed with multiple kernels (Bv40, Bv56 and Bv72) and matrix sizes (512 and 1024 matrix). In SR mode, additional virtual monoenergetic images (40-100 keV) were generated, while UHR mode included only polychromatic reconstructions. Quantitative image quality (noise, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) was measured, and two blinded readers performed qualitative assessments of restenosis visualization. Results: PCD-CT with SR mode at VMI 40 keV achieved the highest image contrast and CNR, significantly outperforming EID-CT and PCD-CTUHR under matched conditions (all p SR-Bv72-40keV at 1024 matrix highest for detecting all degrees of restenosis, with excellent inter-reader agreement (ρ > 0.80). Conclusions: PCD-CT in SR mode at VMI 40 keV, specifically using the Bv72 kernel with a 1024 matrix,…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free