Evidence Hub

Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT for visualization of the brachial plexus

Nakashima M, Kawai T, Matsumoto K, Kawaguchi T, Urano M, Kitera N, Itoh T, Hiwatashi A

European journal of radiology, 2024

60 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the use of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) to improve brachial plexus depiction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent neck CT from March to December 2023. To assess the optimal reconstruction condition in PCD-CT, the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) on images using various quantitative regular (Qr) kernels and strengths of quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) were evaluated. Next, images obtained by ultra-high-resolution mode in PCD-CT (PCD-UHR), standard mode in PCD-CT (PCD-STD), and standard mode in energy-integrating detector CT (EID-STD) of 20 patients each were compared regarding brachial plexus depiction. A qualitative evaluation was performed using a 5-point Likert scale regarding sharpness, noise, and overall image quality. The standard deviations (SDs), SNRs, and contrast-to noise ratios (CNRs) were quantitatively evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 60 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 18; 30 males) were included. The SNRs for the Qr40 and QIR4 (means ± SDs) were 3.6 ± 1.1 and 4.1 ± 1.2, respectively, significantly higher than others (P < 0.05). The scores for overall image quality were 4 [4-5], 3 [3-4], and 2 [2-3], and those for sharpness were 4 [3-5], 3 [3-3], and 2 [1-3] for PCD-UHR, PCD-STD, and EID-STD, respectively (all, P < 0.05). Those for noise were 3 [3-4], 4 [3-4], and 2 [2-2], the SDs were 6.6 ± 1.6, 5.4 ± 0.8, and 8.8 ± 1.7, SNRs were 5.0 ± 1.4, 6,1 ± 1.2, and 3.5 ± 1.6, and CNRs were 5.6 ±…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free