Evidence Hub

Predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using the similarity of quantitative dual-energy CT parameters between the primary lesion and axillary lymph node

Terada K, Kawashima H, Yoneda N, Toshima F, Hirata M, Kobayashi S, Gabata T

Japanese journal of radiology, 2022

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the similarity of quantitative dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) parameters between the primary breast cancer lesion and axillary lymph node (LN) for predicting LN metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with breast cancer who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT between July 2019 and April 2021. Relationships between LN metastasis and simple DECT parameters, similarity of DECT parameters, and pathological and morphological features were analyzed. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic ability.

RESULTS: Overall, 137 LNs (39 metastases and 98 non-metastases) were evaluated. Significant differences were observed in some pathological (nuclear grade, estrogen receptor status, and Ki67 index) and morphological characteristics (shortest and longest diameters of the LN, longest-to-shortest diameter ratio, and hilum), most simple DECT parameters, and all DECT similarity parameters between the LN metastasis and non-metastasis groups (all, P < 0.001-0.004). The shortest diameter of the LN (odds ratio 2.22; 95% confidence interval 1.47, 3.35; P < 0.001) and the similarity parameter of 40-keV attenuation (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval 1.13, 3.53; P = 0.017) were independently associated with LN metastasis compared to simple DECT parameters of 40-keV attenuation (odds ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.99, 1.03; P =0.35). The AUC value of the similarity parameters for predicting metastatic LN was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free