Evidence Hub

Myocardial perfusion imaging with retrospective gating and integrated correction of attenuation, scatter, respiration, motion, and arrhythmia

Nakajima K, Shibutani T, Massanes F, Shimizu T, Yoshida S, Onoguchi M, Kinuya S, Vija AH

Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023

56 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Absolute quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT requires addressing of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in conjunction with providing image quality sufficient for lesion detection and characterization. Iterative reconstruction methods enable the mitigation of the root causes of image degradation. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a new SPECT/CT method with integrated corrections attempting to enable absolute quantitative cardiac imaging (xSPECT Cardiac; xSC).

METHODS: We compared images of prototype xSC and conventional SPECT (Flash3DTM) acquired at rest from 56 patients aged 71 ± 12 y with suspected coronary heart disease. The xSC prototype comprised list-mode acquisitions with continuous rotation and subsequent iterative reconstructions with retrospective electrocardiography (ECG) gating. Besides accurate image formation modeling, patient-specific CT-based attenuation and energy window-based scatter correction, additionally we applied mitigation for patient and organ motion between views (inter-view), and within views (intra-view) for both the gated and ungated reconstruction. We then assessed image quality, semiquantitative regional values, and left ventricular function in the images.

RESULTS: The quality of all xSC images was acceptable for clinical purposes. A polar map showed more uniform distribution for xSC compared with Flash3D, while lower apical count and higher defect contrast of myocardial infarction (p = 0.0004) were observed on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free