Evidence Hub

Insights into ultrasound-promoted degradation of naphthenic acid compounds in oil sands process affected water. Part II: In silico quantum screening of hydroxyl radical initiated and propagated degradation of benzoic acid

Kirpalani DM, Nong A, Ansari R

Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2022

Abstract

In Part I, we outlined the importance of sustainable sonochemical treatment to intensify oil sands process affected water (OSPW) treatment empirically and hypothesized degradation pathways. Herein, we elucidate the formation of intermediate products with well-defined molecular level solutions. Proposed mechanisms describe hydroxylation, decarboxylation and bond scission which drive the degradation of intermediates towards mineralization. This comprehensive first study on in silico screening of sonochemical degradation investigates quantum methods using density functional theory to explain the postulated degradation mechanisms through a theoretical radical attack approach, based on condensed Fukui reactivity indicators. A nudged elasticity band (NEB) approach is applied to find a minimum energy path (MEP), allowing the determination of intermediate products and energy barriers associated with naphthenic acid degradation. This approach provides structures and energies of the breakdown compounds formed along the reaction pathway enabling the determination of molecular reaction kinetics. In continuation of Part 1, the focus of this study is to evaluate sonochemically-induced hydroxyl radical (OH•) reactions of benzoic acid using density functional theory. Hydroxylation and decarboxylation mechanisms of the model naphthenic acid compound and its intermediates were simulated to determine the prospective pathway to ideal mineralization. DFT was applied to calculate interaction…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free