Evidence Hub

Noise-Matched Blending Level Selection for 1024-Matrix CT Images Using Hybrid-Iterative Reconstruction: Comparison With 512-Matrix Images

Omata S, Noda Y, Iritani Y, Ozawa N, Kawai N, Kaga T, Takai Y, Ito A et al.

Journal of computer assisted tomography, 2026

63 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the noise-matched hybrid-iterative reconstruction (IR) blending level for 1024-matrix images with noise equivalent to that of 512-matrix images while preserving comparable image quality.

METHODS: In the phantom study, we identified the noise-matched hybrid-IR blending level for 1024-matrix images that achieved a noise level equivalent to 512-matrix images reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) 30%. This retrospective study included 63 patients (40 women; median age: 74y) who had undergone single-energy pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT) from August 2023 to June 2024. For each patient, 3 image sets at the pancreatic phase were reconstructed: 512-matrix with ASiR-V 30% (group 1), 1024-matrix with ASiR-V 30% (group 2), and 1024-matrix with the noise-matched ASiR-V blending level (group 3). Background noise was measured as the SD of CT attenuation in the abdominal subcutaneous fat. Edge-rise slope (ERS) at the pancreas-fat interface was used to quantify edge sharpness. Two radiologists assessed overall image quality using a 5-point scale.

RESULTS: The phantom study identified 60% as the noise-matched blending level for group 3. Background noise was significantly lower in the order of groups 3, 1, and 2, respectively ( P < 0.001). ERS value was significantly higher in the order of groups 2, 3, and 1, respectively ( P < 0.001). Overall image quality was significantly superior in the order of groups 3, 1, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 63 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free