Evidence Hub

Anterior Segment Nd:YAG Laser Procedures: to Study Intraocular Pressure Spikes and Their Prevention

Singh, N. Sharma, S. Jain

2015

174 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To find out quantum of increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) following anterior segment Nd:YAG laser procedures and extent to which this increase is preventable by different groups of antiglaucoma drugs. Methods: Study design: Cross sectional, randomized, double blind analytical study. One hundred and seventy four eyes of 174 patients who underwent anterior segment Nd:YAG laser procedures {peripheral iridotomy (LPI)/ capsulotomy (YLC)}, using energy limited to 50 mJ, were randomized into five groups. Patients in group 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 received topical Brimonidine tartarate 0.2%, oral Acetazolamide 250mg, topical Dorzolamide hydrochloride 2%, lubricating eye drops plus oral calcium tablets and topical Timolol maleate 0.5% respectively.Patients getting active topical drug were additionally given oral calcium and those getting oral active drug were given topical lubricating drops in a double blind manner. Intraocular pressure was measured at 1, 3, 5 and 24 hours post laser. Results: Rise of IOP from baseline to 1, 3, 5 or 24 hours was not found to be significant in any of the groups receiving ocular hypotensive drug (p>0.05). In the placebo group, the rise of IOP was significant only in one patient at 1, 3 and 5 hours post laser which came down to insignificant

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 174 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free