Evidence Hub

Is the consumption of beverages and food associated to dental erosion? A cross-sectional study in Portuguese athletes

Maria-Raquel G. Silva, Mohamed-Amine Chetti, H. Neves, M. Manso

2021

110 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate if the consumption of acidic food and beverages, including energy drinks is associated with dental erosion in athletes. Methods A questionnaire was applied in 110 athletes (swimmers, bodybuilders, football players, boxers, volleyball players and runners) to collect training and sport practice data, medical history and oral hygiene habits. A semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire was used for acidic beverages and food consumption. The Basic erosive wear examination index was used to evaluate the presence of dental erosion lesions. Participants were organized into 4 groups: swimmers who consumed or did not consume energy drinks, and athletes (except swimmers) who consumed or did not consume energy drinks. Results The prevalence of dental erosion was 83.6%. Of the 110 participants, 49.1% had low risk of erosion, 6.4% had an average risk of erosion, and 0.9% presented high risk of erosion. According to the multivariate logistic analysis, red wine (OR = 1.6; P = 0.038), citrus fruit (OR = 1.3; P = 0.037), frequency of tooth brushing (OR = 2.3; P = 0.018), energy drinks consumption in swimmers (OR = 15.2; P Conclusions The consumption of energy drinks by swimmers more than doubles the chance of dental erosion (BEWE score of “at least low risk”) when compared with non-swimmer athletes consuming the same energy drinks. Athletes consuming energy drinks should be clinical and regularly supervised, especially…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 110 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free