Evidence Hub

The evaluation of the usefulness of CO2 laser in microsurgical resection of brain tumors

Nerntengian N, Tanrikulu L, Manoussos MA, Barettas N, Gkasdaris G, Birbilis T

Surgical neurology international, 2022

29 participants

Abstract

Background: Since its introduction to surgery, the CO2 laser has been used in the treatment of various neurosurgical pathologies as it combines cutting, vaporizing, and coagulating properties in one tool and has a safe penetration depth. In this case series of 29 patients, we present the evaluation of the usefulness of the closed system type - sealed tube surgical CO2 laser in the surgical removal of brain tumors.

Methods: The Sharplan 40C model SurgiTouch, sealed tube type CO2 laser, was used in the resection of 29 brain tumors; 13 meningiomas, six metastases, nine gliomas, and one acoustic neuroma. The same senior surgeon (BT) assessed and classified the benefit provided by the CO2 laser in the resection of the neoplasms to considerable (Group 1), moderate (Group 2), and poor (Group 3).

Results: Group 1 included 14 patients with 13 meningiomas and one acoustic neuroma, Group 2 included six patients, all of whom had metastases, and Group 3 included nine patients of which six had glioblastoma and three astrocytoma. No complications or technical problems occurred due to the use of the CO2 laser.

Conclusion: The CO2 laser is a valuable complementary tool in brain tumor surgery displaying high efficacy and practicality in the resection of neoplasms which are fibrous and have hard consistency. It has high acquisition and maintenance cost and cannot replace the bipolar diathermy. The newest generation of flexible CO2 laser fiber provides more ergonomy and promises new…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free