Evidence Hub

Computational study of the dimerization of glyphosate: mechanism and effect of solvent

Meddeb-Limem S, Ben Fredj A

RSC advances, 2024

Abstract

A computational study on the structure and stability of different series of glyphosate (Glyph) dimers comprising nonionized (N) and zwitterionic structures (Z) for neutral monomers, followed by an analysis of energetics of Glyph dimerization process have been performed by means of quantum chemical calculations in different media. Optimized geometries for energy minima, as well as relative potential and free energies of the possible various conformers of each series of Glyph dimer were computed as a function of the medium at B3LYP-D3/6-311++G(2d,2p) level. The solvation model based on density (SMD) is employed for all solution phase computations. Non-ionized dimers (DN), anion-cation (AC) and either zwitterion-zwitterion (DZP and DZC) or non-ionized-phosphonate zwitterion (NZP) ionized neutral forms of Glyph dimer are predicted to exist in the gas phase and in solution in large contrast to Glyph monomers. The DZC dimer form exhibiting a centrosymmetric arrangement of two carboxylate zwitterion units was found to be the most stable dimer structure in all media. In aqueous solution, the DZP and AC dimer type structures are significantly stabilized by hydration. The tautomerisms between DZC, DZP and AC dimer type structures have been investigated in the gas phase and in solution. The DZC type structures are more prone to experience proton transfer in water than in the gas phase and in cyclohexane. The mechanism for the tautomerization process in neutral ionized Glyph dimers…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free