Evidence Hub

Computational Methods for Molecular Dynamics of Supercooled Water Between 200 and 273 K

Carrascoza F, Gorzelanczyk K, Blazewicz J

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

Water exhibits anomalous thermodynamic and structural behaviour as it approaches and crosses below its melting point. Modelling this behaviour computationally remains challenging: as temperature decreases, nuclear quantum effects (NQEs) become increasingly significant, sampling efficiency deteriorates, and the choice of computational method critically impacts the accuracy of predicted structural and dynamical properties. This review aims to provide practitioners with a practical guide to performing reliable molecular dynamics simulations of water at low temperatures, with emphasis on the supercooled regime (200-273 K). We examine commonly used ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) methods and critically evaluate strategies for incorporating nuclear quantum effects through path-integral molecular dynamics (PIMD), ring-polymer MD (RPMD), and centroid MD (CMD). On cooling through the supercooled regime, the relative importance of nuclear quantum effects increases steadily, so that the error incurred by treating the nuclei classically grows and affects the structural and dynamical properties of interest. The known limitations of density functional approximations for water's structure are assessed in the context of their interplay with NQE treatment, rather than in isolation. By discussing practical considerations, including sampling efficiency and the temperature scaling of path-integral bead counts, alongside the methods themselves, this review is intended to serve as a reference…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free