Evidence Hub

The Effect of Metformin on Vestibular Schwannoma Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Lovin BD, Wilkinson AJ, Qing Y, Hernandez M, Nader ME, Raza S, DeMonte F, Gidley PW

The Laryngoscope, 2023

220 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review and evaluate metformin's potential impact on vestibular schwannoma (VS) growth.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase.

REVIEW METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on sporadic VS patients undergoing initial observation who had at least two magnetic resonance imaging studies. Patients were stratified by metformin use during the observation period. Primary endpoint was VS growth, defined as at least a 2 mm increase in diameter. Survival free of tumor growth was evaluated between groups. Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to produce a pooled odds ratio [OR]. Study heterogeneity was assessed and post-hoc power analysis was performed.

RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included, of which 17% were taking metformin. Median patient age was 56.6 years (range, 25.1-84.5). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Survival analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in time to VS growth between groups (hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29-1.29). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between groups in the odds of VS growth (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.17-1.27). Systematic review identified 3 studies. Meta-analysis suggested that metformin reduces the odds of developing VS growth (pooled OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.29-0.71). Studies demonstrated low between-study heterogeneity. Power…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 220 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free