Evidence Hub

Small Heterocyclic Ligands as Anticancer Agents: QSAR with a Model G-Quadruplex

Kaneti J, Kurteva V, Georgieva M, Krasteva N, Miloshev G, Tabakova N, Petkova Z, Bakalova SM

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022

Abstract

G-quadruplexes (GQs) have become valid targets for anticancer studies in recent decades due to their multifaceted biological function. Herewith, we aim to quantify interactions of potential heterocyclic ligands (Ls) with model GQs. For seven 4-aminoquinazolines and three 2-heteroaryl perimidines, seven of this ten-membered group so far unknown, we use routine quantum chemical modeling. As shown in the literature, a preferred mode of interaction of heterocycles with cellular structures is stacking to exposable faces of G-quadruplexes. To exploit the energy of this interaction as a molecular descriptor and achieve the necessary chemical precision, we use state of the art large-scale density functional theory (DFT) calculations of stacked heterocycles to a GQ. Actually, the GQ has been simplified for the computation by stripping it off all pentose phosphate residues into a naked model of stacked guanine quartets. The described model thus becomes computable. The obtained heterocyclic ligand GQ.L stacking energies, that is, their GQ affinities, are the necessary ligand descriptors. Using the ligand biological inhibitory activities (IC50) on a human malignant melanoma A375 cell line, we obtain a good linear relationship between computed ligand stacking affinities to GQ, and experimental log (IC50) values. Based on the latter relationship, we discuss a putative mechanism of anticancer activity of heterocyclic ligands via stacking interactions with GQs and thereby controlling cell…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free