Evidence Hub

Diamond standard in diagnostics: nanodiamond biolabels make their mark

Barnard AS

The Analyst, 2009

Abstract

Fluorescent defects in non-cytotoxic diamond nanoparticles have recently emerged as a preferred candidate for optical labels in biological and medical imaging. The bright fluorescence at 550-800 nm originates from point defects within the particles, some of which appear naturally, while others can be artificially incorporated during synthesis or can be introduced using high-energy ion beam irradiation and subsequent thermal annealing. However, in order for the fluorescent defects to be useful in bio-medical applications there are a number of materials challenges that must be overcome. In this paper, recent studies on nanodiamonds and their use as biolabels are reviewed, while highlighting the links between the physical, chemical and biological issues that arise.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free