Evidence Hub

Green Synthesis of New Water‐Soluble Nickel (II) and Copper (II) Mixed‐Ligand Complexes: Characterization, DFT, In Vitro Biological Evaluation, and COVID‐19 Molecular Docking

M. Khalaf, H. A. Abd El-Lateef, Amro Ahmed Taha, A. Abdou

Applied organometallic chemistry, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

This study presents the synthesis, characterization, and bioevaluation of novel water‐soluble nickel (NiMNPSCA) and copper (CuMNPSCA) mixed‐ligand complexes. The complexes were synthesized in aqueous media using Ni (II) or Cu (II), sodium salicylate (SCA), and a Schiff base derived from 2‐hydroxy naphthaldehyde (MNP). Comprehensive characterization was achieved using UV–vis, IR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, and thermal and magnetic techniques. Both complexes exhibited exceptional thermal stability (melting points > 300°C), water solubility, and 1:1 electrolyte behavior. Structurally, NiMNPSCA adopts a tetrahedral geometry, while CuMNPSCA features an octahedral arrangement. Quantum chemical analyses revealed a narrower energy gap (ΔE = 3.06 eV) and a higher electrophilicity index (ω = 9.66) for CuMNPSCA, suggesting superior chemical reactivity and biological potential. Both complexes demonstrated significantly enhanced antibacterial, antifungal, and anti‐inflammatory activities compared to their free ligands, with CuMNPSCA showing efficacy comparable to standard agents in both antimicrobial and anti‐inflammatory applications. Notably, CuMNPSCA exhibited potent anti‐inflammatory activity, achieving the highest inhibition rate and an IC50 value competitive with ibuprofen. Molecular docking studies reinforced these findings, highlighting the strong binding affinities of CuMNPSCA to dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS, PDB ID: 5JQ9; −8.00 kcal/mol),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free