Evidence Hub

Experimental and theoretical study on spectral features, reactivity, solvation, topoisomerase I inhibition and in vitro cytotoxicity in human HepG2 cells of guadiscine and guadiscidine aporphine alkaloids

R. Costa, Gabriel de A. Barros, J. N. da Silva, K. M. Oliveira, D. Bezerra, M. Soares, E. Costa

2021

17 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, guadiscine (G1) and guadiscidine (G2), 7,7-dimethylaporphine alkaloids from Guatteria plants, have they geometric paramaters, vibrational behavior and quantum chemical properties (HOMO-LUMO, MEP, ALIE and Fukui indices) analyzed through a theoretical view, by density functional theory (DFT), using the Becker's three-parameter hybrid exchange functional combined with the Lee–Yang–Parr correlation functional (B3LYP) and 6-311G(2d,p) and 6-311G++(2df,3p) basis set. The obtained geometry data were compared with x-ray data for (−)-N-acetyl-anonaine showing close values. Vibrational analysis, together with potential energy distribution (PED) calculations, revealed several characteristic vibrations that characterize the 7,7 dimethylaporphine skeleton, besides enabling the observation of intermolecular H-bonds through dimers formation. Molecular dynamic simulations were carried out, allowing to evaluate the solvation free energies of G1 and G2 in water, methanol and ethanol, as well as the H-bonds formation between G1 and G2 and the tested solvents. The antineoplastic potential of the title molecules was evaluated via molecular docking calculations with topoisomerase I complexed with DNA. Guadiscine and guadiscidine showed, respectively, free binding energies of -8.0 and -8.5 kcal/mol, while topotecan, a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, showed a binding free energy value of -12 kcal/mol, indicating that the studied molecules are good topoisomerase I inhibitors.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a theoretical / analytical, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free