Evidence Hub

High prevalence of blaNDM gene among a series of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates from children less than one year old in Niger

Massir IN, Abdourahamane Y, Ounoussa T, Oumou H, Abdoulaye O, Ousmane A, Harouna M, Souleymane B et al.

BMC microbiology, 2026

14 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales are increasingly reported worldwide, posing significant treatment challenges, especially in vulnerable pediatric populations. This study describes the molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolated from infants under one year of age in Niger. This prospective case series reports on 14 children < 1 year old with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates. RESULTS: A total of 14 isolates were analyzed, predominantly Escherichia coli (78.6%; n = 11), followed by Serratia odorifera (7.1%, n = 1), Klebsiella pneumoniae (7.1%, n = 1), and Klebsiella oxytoca (7.1%, n = 1). The blaNDM gene was the most frequently detected carbapenemase, found in 7 isolates (50.0%), followed by blaVIM in 4 isolates (28.6%), blaKPC in 2 isolates (14.3%), and blaOXA−48 in 1 isolate (7.1%). High resistance rates to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides were observed, with moderate fosfomycin activity. Cefiderocol, tigecycline, and eravacycline demonstrated preserved activity across carbapenemase genotypes, whereas ceftazidime–avibactam showed limited activity against metallo-β-lactamase producers. An apparent relationship between carbapenemase genotype and multidrug resistance phenotype was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates in infants under one year of age represent a major clinical challenge in Niger. The predominance of blaNDM producing organisms, combined…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free