Evidence Hub

Conformation Search Across Multiple-Level Potential-Energy Surfaces (CSAMP): A Strategy for Accurate Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Structures

Wei L, Chi B, Ren Y, Rao L, Wu J, Shang H, Liu J, Xiao Y et al.

Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019

Abstract

Accurate protein binding structure determination presents a great challenge to both experiment and theory. Here, in this work, we propose a new DOX protocol which combines the ensemble molecular Docking as the coarse-level, structure Optimization with the semiempirical quantum mechanics methods as the medium level, and the eXtended ONIOM ( XO) calculations as the fine level. The fundamental of the DOX protocol relies on the Conformation Search Across Multiple-level Potential-energy surfaces (CSAMP) strategy, where the conformation spaces of a funnel-like structure are searched from the coarse level with hundreds of candidates to the medium level with around 10 top candidates to the fine level with the final top 1 or 2 binding modes. An in-depth test for the protocol set up against 28 crystallographic data consisting of HMGR-statins, SDase-inhibitors, 3HNRase-inhibitors, and NA-inhibitors yielded a satisfactory result with ∼0.5 Å root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) on geometries and ∼0.8 kcal/mol absolute error of relative binding energies on average. A further larger scale validation on the Astex test set (including 85 diverse structures) revealed an impressive performance with a RMSD < 2 Å success rate of 99%, suggesting DOX is a promising computational route toward accurate prediction of the protein-ligand binding structures.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a new method / technique, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free