Evidence Hub

[(Bromomethyl)phenyl]methyl-Conjugated Chalcone Derivatives as Potential Lung Cancer Inhibitors: Structure Modification, Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics and In Vitro Validation

Cheechana N, Khamto N, Utama K, Kongsak C, Rithchumpon P, Sangthong P, Meepowpan P

International journal of molecular sciences, 2026

Abstract

Chalcones from medicinal plants are attractive starting points for anticancer lead discovery, and this study aimed to improve the anti-NSCLC potential of 2',4'-dihydroxy-6'-methoxy-3',5'-dimethylchalcone (DMC) from Syzygium nervosum through targeted structural modification and mechanistic computational analysis. Air-dried seeds were extracted with CH2Cl2, DMC was purified by silica gel chromatography and crystallization, and its structure was confirmed by HRMS, FTIR and NMR; 4'-O-derivatization with meta- or para-[(bromomethyl)phenyl]methyl groups afforded derivatives 2a and 2b (89-92% yield). Antiproliferative activity and cytotoxicity were evaluated by MTT assay in NSCLC cell lines (A549, NCI-H460) and normal lung fibroblasts (MRC-5) with osimertinib as a reference. Derivatives 2a and 2b showed enhanced activity against NCI-H460 (IC50 = 7.97 ± 0.62 µM and 7.91 ± 2.77 µM) while remaining weak against A549, and they were less cytotoxic to MRC-5 (IC50 ≥ 50 µM and 16.08 ± 0.45 µM) than osimertinib (IC50 = 3.43 ± 0.35 µM). DFT/MEP analyses, docking to wild-type EGFR (1M17; redocking RMSD 1.228 Å), and 500 ns × 3 replica MD simulations supported improved EGFR binding stability for 2a/2b, with MM/GBSA indicating favorable binding free energies (-28.78 ± 6.11 and -21.99 ± 9.39 kcal/mol). Overall, 4'-O-functionalization of DMC generated lead derivatives with improved in vitro activity in NCI-H460 and computationally supported target-ligand stabilization.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in cell cultures (in vitro) and computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free