Evidence Hub

Quantum Chemical Tailoring of Donor–Acceptor Organic Nanomedicines for Nonlinear Optical Performance and Theragnostic Applications: Molecular Descriptors, In Silico, and Ab Initio Investigations

S. Nadeem, Muhammad Usman Khan, Ł. Szeleszczuk, D. M. Pisklak, Marcin Gackowski, S. Knani, N. Ayari

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2026

Abstract

Nonlinear optical (NLO) active chromophores and their applications in photothermal therapy (PTT) demonstrate great potential in modern theragnostics, owing to their efficient light–matter interactions. A recognized D–π–A chromophore, FTC-3f, which is reported to exhibit a high photothermal conversion efficiency (~51.11%), was structurally modified with various spacers and acceptors to elucidate enhanced PTT and NLO behavior through DFT and TD-DFT simulations. Molecular geometries were optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) level. Their electronic properties, charge separation, and efficient transition pathways were analyzed using frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs), density of states (DOS), UV–visible spectroscopy, photon-induced electron transfer (PET), and transition density matrix (TDM) analysis. Among all the derivatives, D4 exhibited the smallest HOMO–LUMO energy gap (1.701 eV). The highest first-order hyperpolarizability (β) values are found for D4 (1.50 × 105 in the gas phase, 7.40 × 105 in water, 3.06 × 105 in benzene solvent). The βHRS is found to be in the range 5.11 × 104 to 2.97 × 104 and DR (3.65 × 105 to 4.53 × 104) supports the strong NLO response and strong synergistic donor–acceptor interactions. The designed chromophores exhibit much higher SHG and EOPE responses at 532, 1907.21, and 1064 nm than FTC-3F, indicating great potential for the synthesis of effective NLO nanomedicine. Molecular docking with bovine serum albumin (PDB ID: 4F5S) and Bcl-2 (PDB ID: 2W3L)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free