Evidence Hub

Rational design and antibacterial assessment of novel pyranopyrazole derivatives: a combined experimental and in silico study

M. Abdelatty, A. Makhlouf, M. Moustapha, A. Yossef, Z. Farag

Scientific Reports, 2026

Abstract

Pyranopyrazole derivatives were synthesized via multicomponent reactions and characterized using spectroscopic techniques including IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and mass spectrometry. In vitro antibacterial evaluation revealed that compounds 2b, 3a, 5b, and 7b exhibited significant activity against Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis), while compounds 4b, 4d, 6b, and 8b demonstrated potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli). Quantum chemical calculations at the DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level revealed HOMO–LUMO energy gaps ranging from 4.50 to 5.38 eV, with lower energy gaps correlating with enhanced antibacterial activity. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) analysis identified key electron-rich and electron-deficient regions responsible for target recognition. In silico molecular docking studies against tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, an essential bacterial enzyme, demonstrated strong binding affinities with binding energies ranging from −7.84 to −11.30 kcal/mol and calculated inhibition constants (Ki) of 5.23 to 1790 nM. Key interactions involved hydrogen bonding and π-π stacking with active site residues Tyr34, His48, Asp177, and Gln196. ADME property predictions indicated favorable drug-like characteristics with compliance to Lipinski’s Rule of Five and high gastrointestinal absorption. These outstanding results could be due to the presence of aromatic moiety, halogen atom and cyano-group which enhance…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free