Evidence Hub

Heterogeneous associations of antidiabetic medications with cancer prognosis: Evidence from 61 studies with over 1.1 million patients

Luo P, Ding Y, Huang W, Ma W, Lan X, Zhang J, Yang X, Lin A

Pharmacological research, 2026

1,106,966 participants

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic impacts of seven classes of antidiabetic medications in patients with cancer, predominantly in the setting of concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to elucidate their potential differential effects. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science was conducted from inception to May 2025, utilizing keywords including "antidiabetic drugs," "cancer," and "prognosis." Based on predefined criteria, eligible English-language randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were included if they compared the prognostic impacts of metformin, insulin, sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and thiazolidinediones in patients with cancer. The primary outcome domain was all-cause survival, represented by all-cause mortality (ACM) or overall survival (OS) according to the terminology of the original studies. Secondary cancer-related outcomes included cancer-specific mortality (CSM), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multiple independent investigators performed data extraction and quality assessment. Statistical analyses were performed using OnlineMeta V1.1. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were used for all primary meta-analyses to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,106,966 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free