Evidence Hub

Obesity Management Pharmacotherapies and Lifestyle Treatment for Pediatric Obesity Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Wan KW, Lei EF, Liu Y, Taddese AA, Ip P, Torbahn G, Weghuber D, Huang WY et al.

JAMA pediatrics, 2026

3,835 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Importance: Pediatric obesity is a global health challenge. Although health behavior and lifestyle treatment (HBLT) is foundational, the comparative effectiveness of HBLT, various pharmacotherapies, and their combinations remains unclear.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of obesity management pharmacotherapies, structured lifestyle treatment, and their combinations on weight management outcomes in children and adolescents living with obesity.

Data sources: A systematic search was conducted in 4 electronic databases (Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PubMed) from inception to June 17, 2025.

Data selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving children and adolescents (aged 10-19 years) with obesity were selected. Interventions included lifestyle treatment (HBLT and counseling), obesity management pharmacotherapies (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, metformin, orlistat, phentermine topiramate), or their combination vs control.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted and validity assessed according to PRISMA guidelines. A random-effects network meta-analysis was used to pool data. Meta-regression was used to explore outcome moderators.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) and BMI z score; secondary outcomes included waist circumference (WC), fat mass (FM), and lean mass (LM).

Results: A total of 42 RCTs with 3835 participants (median [IQR]…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,835 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free