Evidence Hub

Comparative neuroprotective effects of antidiabetic medications on Parkinson's disease risk: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Lee SH, Rho Y, Lee S, Shin S, Choi YJ

Journal of global health, 2026

712 participants

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is recognised as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD); however, comparative evidence regarding PD risk across antidiabetic drug classes remains limited and inconsistent. We aimed to compare the risk of PD across different antidiabetic classes, with stratified analyses by age, sex, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) status.

Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed until August 2025 for studies assessing the association between antidiabetic drugs and PD incidence. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis, estimating effect sizes as risk ratios with 95% credible intervals. We performed prespecified subgroup analyses according to age, sex, and CVD status.

Results: We included nine observational cohort studies, totalling 712 287 patients. No antidiabetic class demonstrated a statistically significant difference in PD risk. Rank probability analyses suggested that sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) tended to rank lowest in PD risk among older adults (≥75 years), while glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) ranked lowest in patients aged <75 years. In patients with CVD, metformin showed relatively higher-ranking probabilities for PD risk compared with SGLT2i. In contrast, metformin, sulfonylureas, and α-glucosidase inhibitors were consistently associated with higher ranking probabilities for PD risk compared to newer agents.

Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that antidiabetic drugs may exert…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 712 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free