Evidence Hub

Cardiac Structure, Function and Mechanics in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J. Edwards, V. Giorgione, Megan Griffiths, Claire Compton, E. Greenhough, E. Smith, Eliane Cunliffe, N. Jalaludeen et al.

HYPERTENSION, 2025

7,168 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are among the most common pregnancy complications and leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. This study aimed to perform the largest meta-analysis to date comparing conventional and advanced echocardiographic features in HDP against healthy pregnancy.

METHODS

PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE were systematically searched for research articles published up to March 2024. Included studies reported at least 1 relevant echocardiographic parameter in pregnancies complicated by HDP and normotensive healthy pregnancies separately. A total of 53 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 7168 participants (3381 HDP and 3787 controls).

RESULTS

Myocardial mechanics, as measured by global longitudinal strain (weighted mean difference (WMD), -2.81% [95% CI, -3.70 to -1.91]; P<0.001) and left atrial reservoir strain (WMD, -9.36% [95% CI, -12.73 to -5.99]; P<0.001), were significantly impaired in HDP compared with healthy pregnancy. Furthermore, there were prominent cardiac structural differences, with significantly greater left ventricular mass index (WMD, 12.20 [95% CI, 9.77-14.64]; P<0.001), relative wall thickness (WMD, 0.055 [95% CI, 0.04-0.07]; P<0.001), left atrial size (WMD, 2.34 cm [95% CI, 1.62-3.06]; P<0.001), and left atrial volume index (WMD, 2.38 mL/m2 [95% CI, 1.44-3.32]; P<0.001) in HDP compared with healthy pregnancy. Finally, the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and early mitral annular…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,168 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free