Evidence Hub

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and the risk of Parkinson's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of large-scale real-world data

Chen Y, Wang X, Wang J, Ma G

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

452,763 participants

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, yet effective disease-modifying therapies remain elusive. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), widely used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have shown neuroprotective potential in preclinical studies. However, real-world evidence on the association between GLP-1RAs use and PD risk remains inconsistent and has not been systematically synthesized. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate this association using large-scale real-world data.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from database inception to March 18, 2026, for cohort and case-control studies exploring the association between GLP-1RA exposure and PD risk among patients with T2DM. Study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers. All meta-analyses were performed using Stata 15.0 software.

Results: A total of six studies were included, involving 452,763 participants. The meta-analysis revealed that GLP-1RA exposure was significantly associated with a reduced risk of PD in patients with T2DM (HR = 0.68, 95%CI (0.54,0.85), P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, metformin, and other hypoglycemic drugs, GLP-1RAs were linked to a lower risk of incident PD (DPP-4 inhibitors: HR = 0.60, 95%CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 452,763 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free