Evidence Hub

Impact of metformin use during pregnancy on fetal congenital malformations across 11 organ systems: a meta-analysis and drug-target Mendelian randomization study

Ji H, Wu Y, Wu S, Sun X, Yu Y, Hou L, Zhao R, Wang C et al.

Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2026

Abstract

Aims: Metformin is a cost-effective alternative to insulin for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), yet concerns regarding potential teratogenicity persist. This study aimed to evaluate the association between prenatal metformin exposure and multisystem congenital malformations (CMs), and to explore biologically relevant pathways.

Methods: This study first conducted a meta-analysis of RCTs and cohort studies assessing maternal metformin use and fetal CMs. Subsequently, drug-target Mendelian randomization (DTMR) examined genetically proxied associations between metformin pharmacodynamic targets (eQTLs) and 64 CMs (FinnGen), reflecting lifelong target perturbation, adjusting for maternal confounders and validating with placental eQTL data.

Results: Meta-analysis showed a protective effect of metformin versus insulin on overall CMs (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.99). In DTMR, following Bonferroni correction and covariate adjustment, seven of 92 target genes (e.g., NDUFS5, NDUFA2) showed significant associations, primarily exhibiting protective effects against circulatory and musculoskeletal system. Validation in placental eQTLs corroborated the direction of effects for 17 gene-outcome pairs, reinforcing the robustness of key safety signals.

Conclusion: By integrating clinical and genetic evidence, this study is consistent with the overall clinical safety of metformin use during pregnancy with respect to congenital malformations and provides hypothesis-generating insights into…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free