Evidence Hub

Men's perceptions of living with osteoporosis: a systematic review of qualitative studies

M. Compton, W. Ben Mortenson, J. Sale, Alex Crossman, M. Ashe

International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing, 2019

61 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One in five men will experience an osteoporosis-related fracture in their lifetime. However, osteoporosis is widely perceived as a women's disease and few studies focus specifically on men. Our objective was to identify qualitative evidence to understand men's perceptions of osteoporosis and fracture.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review following standardized guidelines. We identified qualitative studies that included men aged 18 years and over using the terms: osteoporosis, fragility or low-trauma fracture, bone health; and perceptions or experiences with osteoporosis and fractures. We appraised the quality of data and used a meta-aggregative approach to synthesize findings.

RESULTS

We identified four publications, based on three studies (n = 61 participants); one of the publications was a secondary analysis. The following themes were developed from the literature: (1) perceived healthcare gap for men; (2) strong focus on women, with a need for support from spouses and health professionals; and (3) three general responses to men's osteoporosis self-management: limiting lifestyle, minimizing importance of diagnosis, and risk taking.

CONCLUSIONS

The most striking finding from this review was the lack of available qualitative evidence. However, it emerged that the present focus of osteoporosis as a women's disease may influence how men develop self-management strategies. These data highlight the need to include men in future osteoporosis health-related…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 61 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free