Evidence Hub

Systemic Therapy in Patients with Resectable and Unresectable Cases of Giant Cell Tumor: A Systematic Review

P. Kaiser, Jocelyn T. Compton, Jon-Michael E. Caldwell, T. Hickernell, F. Y. Lee

2014

487 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Giant cell

tumor (GCT) is a common benign tumor of the appendicular and axial skeleton

that represents 5% of all primary bone tumors. In recent years, the combination

of conventional aggressive curettage with targeted adjuvant anti-osteoclastic

agents including bisphosphonates and denosumab have led to lower recurrence

rates in patients with GCT in a small number of retrospective case series.

Furthermore, efficacy of the same anti-osteoclastic agents has been shown in

cases of unresectable GCT of bone, leading to decreased rates of tumor

progression and stabilization of disease. This review assesses whether the

current literature weakly, moderately, or strongly supports a targeted systemic

treatment as the standard of care in patients with GCT. Methods: We conducted a

current search of the MEDLINE database for literature pertaining to systemic

GCT treatment. Our inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) studies that reported

on a series of patients with resectable or unresectable cases of GCT; 2) a subset of patients must have been

treated with systemic bisphosphonate or RANK-L inhibitor therapy; 3) each series had a minimum of 10

patients with histopathologically confirmed GCT; 4) each series stated their follow-up

period. Results: Overall 6 studies, reporting on a total of 487 patients, were

selected for inclusion in this review. For analysis, these 6 retrospective

studies were subdivided into series where all GCT patients had resectable

tumors (n = 4) and series…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 487 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free