Evidence Hub

Three-year results of a randomized prospective trial of methionyl human growth hormone and oxandrolone in Turner syndrome

R. Rosenfeld, R. Hintz, A. Johanson, Barry M. Sherman, J. Brasel, S. Burstein, S. Chernausek, P. Compton et al.

Jornal de Pediatria, 1988

120 citations

Abstract

Seventy girls with Turner syndrome, 4 to 12 years of age, participated in a prospective, randomized study to determine the effects on growth of methionyl human growth hormone (met-hGH) or oxandrolone. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either no treatment (control) or met-hGH (0.125 mg/kg three times per week), oxandrolone (0.125 mg/kg/day), or combination met-hGH plus oxandrolone. At the end of an initial period of 12 to 20 months, patients in the original control and oxandrolone groups were given combination met-hGH plus oxandrolone. At that time the dosage of oxandrolone was lowered to 0.0625 mg/kg/day. Sixty-five subjects have now completed the first 3 years of the study. Compared with the control growth rate for year 1 (3.8 cm/yr), significant increases in growth rate were seen in all 3 years of combination therapy (9.8, 7.4, and 6.1 cm/yr, respectively) and in the first 2 years of treatment with met-hGH alone (6.6, 5.4, and 4.6 cm/yr). When growth velocity was expressed as standard deviation for age in girls with Turner syndrome, significant increases relative to the control group for year 1 (-0.1 SD) were seen in all three years of both combination therapy and met-hGH alone (combination, +6.6, +4.3, +3.0 SD; met-hGH, +3.1, +2.0, +1.4 SD). After 3 years of treatment, predicted adult height by the method of Bayley-Pinneau increased 4.5 cm in the met-hGH group and 8.2 cm in the combination group.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free