Evidence Hub

Characteristics and Predictors of Patient and Parent Satisfaction in the Treatment of Youth Anxiety Disorders

Galen D. McNeil, Ruben G. Martinez, John C. Piacentini, J. Strawn, Philip C. Kendall, S. Compton, James T. McCracken, John T. Walkup et al.

Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2025

429 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Objective: To describe the rates and predictors of youth and parent satisfaction following engagement in one of three evidence-based treatments or a placebo control for youth anxiety. Method: In a multisite randomized controlled trial (RCT) of youth ages 7–17 (n = 426) and parents (n = 429) comparing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), sertraline (SRT), the combination of the two (COMB), and placebo (PBO), we examined satisfaction at the end of acute treatment and assessed predictors including clinical change, pretreatment expectations, reactions to treatment assignment, and therapeutic relationship using multiple hierarchical linear regressions. Results: Satisfaction was high across all treatments. Both parents and youth reported the highest satisfaction with COMB, followed by CBT and SRT, and the least satisfaction with PBO. Parents were more satisfied than youth, and remitters were more satisfied than nonremitters. In CBT-containing arms, a stronger child–therapist relationship at week 6 predicted greater parent and youth satisfaction. Higher expectations of improvement at pretreatment predicted greater youth, but not parent, satisfaction in CBT and SRT. Discussion: Posttreatment, youth and parents report greater satisfaction with combination therapy over the monotherapies and PBO. Satisfaction patterns largely mirror clinical outcomes. An early strong youth-reported therapeutic alliance is key to satisfaction in CBT, highlighting the importance of child–therapist…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 429 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free