Evidence Hub

Secondary Outcomes From the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study: Implications for Clinical Practice

A. Albano, Jonathan S. Comer, S. Compton, J. Piacentini, P. Kendall, B. Birmaher, J. Walkup, Golda S. Ginsburg et al.

Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2017

488 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Controlled evaluations comparing medication, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and their combination in the treatment of youth anxiety have predominantly focused on global ratings by independent evaluators. Such ratings are resource intensive, may be of limited generalizability, and do not directly inform our understanding of treatment responses from the perspective of treated families. We examined outcomes from the perspective of treated youth and parents in the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study. Participants (N = 488; ages 7–17 years) who had a primary diagnosis of separation, social, and/or generalized anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to a treatment condition in the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study trial. Linear mixed-effects and analysis of covariance models examined parent- and youth-reported anxiety symptoms, impact of anxiety, broader internalizing and externalizing psychopathology, depressive symptoms, and family burden throughout the 12-week acute treatment phase and 6-month follow-up. At Week 12, combination treatment showed superiority over placebo, sertraline, and CBT with regard to parent-reported youth anxiety symptoms, and sertraline and CBT as monotherapies showed superiority over placebo with regard to parent-reported youth anxiety. Combination therapy and sertraline also showed Week 12 superiority over placebo with regard to parent-reported internalizing psychopathology, and superiority over placebo and CBT with regard to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 488 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free